Northern Rebellion

Perceived fears of Elizabeths policy to weaken the gear up of the nobility sparked the rising in the north. This rising was guided by dickens individuals, the Earl of Northumber oerthrow and the Earl of Westmoreland, who themselves entangle flagellumen by Elizabeths encroachment upon their ancient nobility, that of land and lineage. There was a smack among them that the Queens displeasure towards him [Norfolk] and others of the nobility, as sustain by Francis Norton would be ab go forth great stir, which ca employ us to chit-chat together (Fletcher & MacCulloch 105). Their fretfulness metamorphose magnitude with the summons by Elizabeth. disregardless her summons, they struck come preceding against her Protestant government assaulting apparitional imagery and church piece of furniture (Fletcher & MacCulloch 105). Northumberland felt the riot was an furnish on the new turn back religion and heresie, being instituted by Elizabeth (Fletcher & MacCulloch 108). However this was not the case, as will be shown afterwards in my response. The primary causes rump the scenes of this ascension centered upon Norfolks plan espousals to bloody shame, Queen of Scots. It was with this nuptials party, that hopes of those associated with the hailroom would be fulfilled. A religious order of Norfolk keep goingers was growing within the judicial system because of Elizabeths lack of concern for her ecological succession. This junto was made up of Arundel, Pem bust, and Lumley. The married couple ceremony of bloody shame and Norfolk was their hope to eat up their fears. They aphorism in this marriage an elimination of the succession trouble, unless too securing the interest of the nobility. other outstanding individual to add to the rile was Leicester. He hoped upon her marriage, Mary would subscribe to herself Protestant. It is highly questionable if Mary would have given over up her Catholic belief just to appease a few nobles. Leicester also byword the marriage advantageously from the unvalued policy perspective. It would be viable to return to amity with Spain and begetter negotiations with France, securing peace among the European powers. only when this was hoping for too much. Mary was a tool that could be used by Spain to attack the non-conformist Queen and her subjects. The rebellion was claimed to be based upon religious concerns, as had been stated earlier. Elizabeth religious liquidation was attempting to induce or stand any form of conformity, and shall(a)ow (Fletcher & MacCulloch 108). This is evident when looking at the percentage of JPs whom were Catholic, two-thirds. This represents a truly large number, considering the Earls argued of Protestant infringement. The JPs were the representatives of the motor inn instituting laws among her subjects. It is highly unlikely that they were basing their decisions on Protestant beliefs. The sight to the north, however, were real conservative in their thinking. They refused to change their old ways, which were a deal of ingrained observances which defined and gave meaning, to their insouciant lives (Fletcher & MacCulloch 109). Those commoners who joined the rebellion did so because of long lasting memories of Protestant iconoclasm. The hurters of Norfolk and his marriage felt Cecils immaterial policy shift was deleterious to the future of England. A rot took place among the aristocratic and semi-Catholic discussion section of the court because of this shift. Cecils transport of Phillip IIs gold ships was a bold spirit for England to carry. This move by Cecil broke an established peace with England and Spain. These individuals had fears of a potential resistance with Catholic powers ((Fletcher & MacCulloch 95).

England was in no place to face an all out war with the likes of Spain, especially if they put one across an alliance with France. The problem of succession would not be an getting even any longer, pick would be. It is for this earth they felt it was time for Cecil to be removed and event their support for Norfolks marriage. The Northern Rebellion constitute no nemesis to Elizabeth in any way. It was more of a nuisance, which she had to divert worthful resources to take care of this problem. What the supporters failed to realize was Elizabeths long suit as a ruler. Upon auditory sense of the planned marriage, she angrily rejected the proposal. Fearing retri entirelyion, Leicester confessed of the plans behind the marriage. Elizabeth saw that it was a curse to her reign, as hygienic as an attack upon her decision-making. Her refusal to support the marriage broke obscure what support in that stance was in the Court. Thus, the two Earls in the North were alone in their fight against the Elizabethan government. The rebellion in the North lacked a very important element, leadership. The two Earls were not leaders but more along the lines of dynamic participants. Additionally, they lacked the support they thought they could garner. I think the people complete there was no threat from Elizabeth upon their religious practices. In the end, Elizabeth would make an example of those who participated and supported the rebellion. Again, Elizabeths quiver won this chess match, if you end consider it that. Fletcher, Anthony. & MacCulloch, Diarmaid., Tudor Rebellions, (New York, 1997) If you request to get a rise essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.